Search is Powered by Google
Medical Malpractice / Litigation News

Men Sentenced For Illegal Internet Sale Of Unlicensed Sex Drug, UK

Main Category: Medical Malpractice / Litigation
Also Included In: IT / Internet / E-mail;  Erectile Dysfunction / Premature Ejaculation
Article Date: 28 May 2008 - 4:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon view / write opinions   rate icon rate article
Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public:not yet rated

Health Professional:4 and a half stars

4.5 (2 votes)

Article Opinions: 0 posts

Two men were sentenced on 21 May 2008 at Lewes Crown Court for the illegal sale and supply of an unlicensed medicine used to treat male erectile dysfunction under the Medicines Act 1968. The sentencing followed an investigation by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

Colin Richard Hudson (52) of Hailsham, East Sussex was sentenced to eight months and two weeks imprisonment suspended for two years. Scott Hodgkiss (37) of Stoke-On-Trent, Staffordshire, received 120 hours community service. They had both previously pleaded guilty to a conspiracy charge under offences contrary to the Medicines Act 1968 concerning the illegal sale and supply of Kamagra on the Internet over a period of nearly seven months.

MHRA enquiries revealed that Mr Hodgkiss operated a website called www.kamagra100.co.uk. In February 2006, a search by MHRA enforcement officers of Mr Hodgkiss' home address discovered a large quantity of Kamagra in tablet and jelly form with an estimated street value of £23,000. Further investigation pointed to Mr Hudson as being Mr Hodgkiss' supplier who was operating a website called www.kamagraman.co.uk. A search of Mr Hudson's home address recovered documentation referring to Kamagra from his computer.

Mick Deats, Enforcement Group Manager at the MHRA said, "There is considerable risk to the public from obtaining medicines through unregulated websites. The websites operated by Mr Hodgkiss and Mr Hudson were offering an unlicensed medicine. A medicine bought in this way has no guarantee of safety, quality or effectiveness."

Notes

1. The MHRA is the government agency responsible for ensuring that medicines and medical devices work, and are acceptably safe. No product is risk-free. Underpinning all our work lie robust and fact-based judgements to ensure that the benefits to patients and the public justify the risks. We keep watch over medicines and devices, and take any necessary action to protect the public promptly if there is a problem. We encourage everyone -the public and healthcare professionals as well as the industry - to tell us about any problems with a medicine or medical device, so that we can investigate and take any necessary action.

2. If an individual is convicted of offences under the Medicines Act 1968, they can be sentenced to a maximum of two years imprisonment and/or an unlimited fine. Where appropriate the MHRA will use the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to determine whether or not benefits were accrued through criminal activity and will recoup illicit earnings if the individual is found guilty.

http://www.mhra.gov.uk




Customized Homepage Weekly Newsletters Daily News Alerts
Home About Us News Licensing Free Website Feeds Free Tools & Content Links Tell a Friend Accessibility Help / FAQ Article Submission Contact Us
Psychiatry Urology
Bipolar Diabetes Schizophrenia

customize your homepage

medical news gadget

Add to Google


developers
website gadget code
website news code
medical news rss feed links


MedReader RSS Reader

customize your homepage


What to Look For When You Want to Get Rid of the Ink
What to Look For When You Want to Get Rid of the Ink

Experts say you should go to a board-certified dermatologist, who is experienced with lasers and specializes in removing tattoos. It's also good to know what can and can't be removed.

more videos are available in our health videos section.